🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.